NEWS

Changes to the Oaths Act 1900

New changes to the Oaths Act 1900 (NSW) (“the Act”) took effect as and from 30 April 2012, with the insertion of new sections 34 and 35 into the Act pursuant to Schedule 2 of the Identification Legislation Amendment Act 2011.

The changes require new prescribed steps for authorised witnesses to undertake when witnessing statutory declarations and affidavits.

The new steps require an authorised witness, that is a solicitor, barrister, justice of the peace, notary public, and Australian or British consular officer to:

  • see the face of the person making the declaration or affidavit (“the Deponent”); and
  • know the Deponent for at least 12 months or confirm the Deponent’s identity by sighting an original or certified copy of an identification document (e.g. the Deponent’s birth certificate, driver’s licence, passport, Medicare card, pensioner concession card, credit or bank account card, electoral enrolment card or student identity card); and
  • certify on the declaration or affidavit that these steps have been followed.

If the Deponent is wearing a face covering (e.g. a helmet, mask or item of clothing whether partly or wholly covering the Deponent’s face), an authorised witness may request that the face covering be removed. The authorised witness must otherwise be satisfied that there is a special justification (for example, a legitimate medical reason) for not removing the face covering.

Schedule 1 of the Oaths Regulations 2011 (NSW) provides the following suggested wording of the certification to be provided by the authorised witness:

Certificate under section 34(1)(c) of Oaths Act 1900
*Please cross out any text that does not apply

I [insert name of authorised witness], a [insert qualification to be authorised witness], certify the following matters concerning the making of this *statutory declaration/affidavit by the person who made it:

  1. *I saw the face of the person; or
    *I did not see the face of the person because the person was wearing a face covering, but I am satisfied that the person had a special justification for not removing the covering.
  2. *I have known the person for at least 12 months; or
    *I have not known the person for at least 12 months, but I have confirmed the person’s identity using an identification document and the document I relied on was [describe identification document relied on].

[insert signature of authorised witness]
Date:

An authorised witness may be fined for failure to comply with the prescribed steps.

Related News

Zamagias v Saltalamacchia [2026] NSWCA 48: A Lesson on the Value of Contemporaneous Evidence

In a decision handed down by the New South Wales Court of Appeal on 2 April 2026, Justice Adamson with President Ward and Justice Free

Read More

Winner of the Australasian Lawyer 2026 Top Specialist Firm

We are thrilled to announce that we have been recognised by Australasian Lawyers as one of the Top Specialists Firms 2026 in Australia & NZ

Read More

Ownership vs Bailment vs Equitable Ownership

Someone bringing a claim needs to first show that they are entitled to do so – i.e. “standing”. Proving standing generally means proving that the

Read More

Get in touch

Contact our team today

William Roberts Lawyers

Sydney

Level 22
66 Goulburn Street
SYDNEY NSW 2000

PO Box 20424, World Square NSW 2000

Melbourne

Level 7,

171 La Trobe Street
MELBOURNE VIC 3000

 

PO Box 13171, Law Courts VIC 8010

Brisbane

Level 9
193 North Quay
BRISBANE QLD 4000

 

PO Box 12170, George Street QLD 4003

Singapore

Level 19
Singapore Land Tower
50 Raffles Place
SINGAPORE 048623