EXPERTISE

GENERAL COMMERCIAL LITIGATION

Our philosophy is to adopt a functional approach to disputes.

Together with our clients, objectives are determined, case theories developed and strategies implemented to achieve a just, quick and cheap resolution consistent with modern case management principles.

We take a pragmatic approach to litigation by seeking to narrow the material issues in dispute. This is done through mechanisms available to parties such as issuing notices to admit facts and authenticity of documents; if appropriate, administering interrogatories; identifying questions to be determined separately and before any other matter in issue with a view to early resolution of the dispute; serving offers of compromise shortly after the close of pleadings; and briefing experts before or shortly after the commencement of proceedings.

Mindful of costs, a commercial approach to litigation means we always consider alternative dispute resolution methods by engaging in early dialogue with other parties. Early dialogue allows us to best determine and advise you on the method and timing of alternative dispute resolution processes.

Clients instruct us to handle their largest and most complex international cases because of our experience derived from some of the most high-profile disputes of recent years; our seamless service; and our market focus, expertise and insight. Areas in which we can assist, include:

  • Banking, regulatory and finance disputes
  • Contract disputes
  • Competition disputes
  • Reformation
  • Misleading and deceptive conduct disputes
  • Fraud
  • Product liability
  • Property disputes
  • Technology disputes

Please contact our offices if you would like to discuss your needs on 02 9552 2111

Related Insights

Dispute Resolution and the Franchising Code of Conduct Reforms

Recently, the reform to the Franchising Code of Conduct was introduced by the Competition and Consumer (Industry Codes – Franchising) Amendment (Fairness in Franchising) Regulations 2021 came

Read More

ACCC Playing Watchdog Against Apple Over Fortnite

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has taken a watchful eye over the conduct of Apple in the matter of Epic Games, Inc v Apple Inc [2021]

Read More

AFCA or the Court?

D H Flinders Pty Ltd v Australian Financial Complaints Authority Ltd [2020] NSWSC 1690 In a recent decision of the Supreme Court of NSW, Stevenson

Read More

Abuse of process – digital discovery and difficult discussions – Moody Kiddell & Partners Pty Ltd v Arkell

“Learn from the mistakes of others. You can’t live long enough to make them all yourself” – Elenor Roosevelt It is rare that reported cases

Read More

Appeals in the strictest sense of the word as explained in Yehia v Williams

The Appeal Yehia v Williams [2022] VSC 197 (Yehia) concerned an appeal against the orders made by Magistrate Foster, pursuant to section 109 of the Magistrates’ Court Act 1989 (Vic).

Read More

Can lawyers claim professional costs for litigating?

The High Court decision in Bell Lawyers Pty v Pentelow [2019] HCA 29 has held the long standing Chorley (London Scottish Benefit Society v Chorley (1884) 13 QBD 872)

Read More

Greater consumer-focused outcomes in sight with latest reforms in the Financial Services Sector

Arising from the recommendations and findings of the Royal Commission into Misconduct into the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry (‘Royal Commission’), the following six

Read More

High Court Considers Unconscionable Conduct in Asset-Based Lending

In Stubbings v Jams 2 Pty Ltd [2022] HCA 6, the High Court of Australia considered the circumstances in which a non-bank lender acts unconscionably in providing

Read More

Litigation Lotteries

Abuse of process and the overarching purpose of civil practice and procedure. On 17 October 2018 a complex multi-party and jurisdiction dispute came to an

Read More

Onus and Burden of Proof in Civil Claims

In civil cases involving monetary claims for damages, breaches of contract, or tort actions, understanding the concepts of onus of proof and burden of proof

Read More

Unveiling Anonymity in the Federal Court – Federal Court Rules 2011

In the modern environment of rising cyber security incidents,1 compounded with an increase in the anonymity of individuals behind the cyber veil, the utilisation of the

Read More

Robert Ishak

Principal Lawyer, Director

Bill Petrovski

Principal Lawyer, Director

Carlos Jaramillo

Principal Lawyer, Director

VIEW OUR TEAM

Get in touch

Contact our team today

William Roberts Lawyers

Sydney

Level 22
66 Goulburn Street
SYDNEY NSW 2000

PO Box 20424, World Square NSW 2000

Melbourne

Level 7,

171 La Trobe Street
MELBOURNE VIC 3000

 

PO Box 13171, Law Courts VIC 8010

Brisbane

Level 9
193 North Quay
BRISBANE QLD 4000

 

PO Box 12170, George Street QLD 4003

Singapore

Level 19
Singapore Land Tower
50 Raffles Place
SINGAPORE 048623