NEWS

When is an application deemed to have been refused?

Applications made to local consent authorities follow a statutory process for determination.

The Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) provides that applications may either be approved, may be deemed to have been refused, or actually be refused.

When is an application deemed to have been refused?

Where a local consent authority has failed to respond within 42 days of having received a validly lodged development application (or 62 days for designated developments or integrated developments) then Regulation 113 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 (NSW) provides that the application is deemed to have refused.

Actual Refusal

Where the application is determined and not endorsed, the application is refused.

Appeals

In circumstances where an application is deemed to have been refused, or is actually assessed and refused, an aggrieved party may:

  1. Consider appealing through the council’s internal review procedures.
  2. Appeal the decision within 6 months of notice to the Land and Environment Court of NSW.

Prior to lodging an appeal, it would be prudent to ensure that all relevant matters have been dealt with including:

  1. The full development application fee has been paid to the local council;
  2. All relevant documents have been provided to the local council prior to assessment;
  3. Copies of any documents or material that have been lodged with the local council at any time are in your possession.
  4. All procedural requirements that were required prior to development consent being granted have materialised, including but not limited to, public notification.
  5. The plans attached to the development application must satisfy Schedule A to the Class 1 Practice Note of the Land and Environment Court.
  6. If there was an actual refusal, obtain a copy of the local council’s Notice of Determination that refused the development application.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Related News

Lessons from Bremner v French (No 6) [2026] NSWSC 826

Please, Your Honour, May I Have Some More (of my fees)? – Lessons from Bremner v French (No 6) [2026] NSWSC 826 Justice Parker’s decision

Read More

Zamagias v Saltalamacchia [2026] NSWCA 48: A Lesson on the Value of Contemporaneous Evidence

In a decision handed down by the New South Wales Court of Appeal on 2 April 2026, Justice Adamson with President Ward and Justice Free

Read More

Ownership vs Bailment vs Equitable Ownership

Someone bringing a claim needs to first show that they are entitled to do so – i.e. “standing”. Proving standing generally means proving that the

Read More

Get in touch

Contact our team today

William Roberts Lawyers

Sydney

Level 22
66 Goulburn Street
SYDNEY NSW 2000

PO Box 20424, World Square NSW 2000

Melbourne

Level 7,

171 La Trobe Street
MELBOURNE VIC 3000

 

PO Box 13171, Law Courts VIC 8010

Brisbane

Level 9
193 North Quay
BRISBANE QLD 4000

 

PO Box 12170, George Street QLD 4003

Singapore

Level 19
Singapore Land Tower
50 Raffles Place
SINGAPORE 048623