NEWS

When is an application deemed to have been refused?

Applications made to local consent authorities follow a statutory process for determination.

The Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) provides that applications may either be approved, may be deemed to have been refused, or actually be refused.

When is an application deemed to have been refused?

Where a local consent authority has failed to respond within 42 days of having received a validly lodged development application (or 62 days for designated developments or integrated developments) then Regulation 113 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 (NSW) provides that the application is deemed to have refused.

Actual Refusal

Where the application is determined and not endorsed, the application is refused.

Appeals

In circumstances where an application is deemed to have been refused, or is actually assessed and refused, an aggrieved party may:

  1. Consider appealing through the council’s internal review procedures.
  2. Appeal the decision within 6 months of notice to the Land and Environment Court of NSW.

Prior to lodging an appeal, it would be prudent to ensure that all relevant matters have been dealt with including:

  1. The full development application fee has been paid to the local council;
  2. All relevant documents have been provided to the local council prior to assessment;
  3. Copies of any documents or material that have been lodged with the local council at any time are in your possession.
  4. All procedural requirements that were required prior to development consent being granted have materialised, including but not limited to, public notification.
  5. The plans attached to the development application must satisfy Schedule A to the Class 1 Practice Note of the Land and Environment Court.
  6. If there was an actual refusal, obtain a copy of the local council’s Notice of Determination that refused the development application.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Related News

The Rise of AI: Security vs Privacy

Artificial Intelligence is no longer confined to the realm of science fiction—it is a driving force that is shaping our future in ways most never

Read More

The Ripple Effects of John Rauof Megally v Andja Bojanic [2023] NSWLC 9: A Game-Changer in Motor Vehicle Damage Claims

In the recent decision of John Rauof Megally v Andja Bojanic [2023] NSWLC 9, the New South Wales Local Court provided important insights into the

Read More

When “Plain English” is not: ASIC v HCF Life Insurance Company Pty Limited [2024] FCA 1240

Life Insurance policies routinely exclude pre-existing conditions from coverage, but   s 47 of the Insurance  Contracts Act  1984  ( Cth)  provides that insurers cannot rely

Read More

Get in touch

Contact our team today

Stay informed

Keep up-to-date with our regular news and insights

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
William Roberts Lawyers

Sydney

Level 22
66 Goulburn Street
SYDNEY NSW 2000

Melbourne

Level 21
535 Bourke Street
MELBOURNE VIC 3000

Brisbane

Level 9
193 North Quay
BRISBANE QLD 4000

Singapore

Level 19
Singapore Land Tower
50 Raffles Place
SINGAPORE 048623