NEWS

Dwelling or Not? –  Dobrohotoff v Bennic

In Dobrohotoff v Bennic [2013] NSWLEC 61, the New South Wales Land and Environment Court deemed short term holiday home rentals in the Gosford area as unlawful and prohibited. This decision has broader implications on landlords seeking returns from the holiday rental market.

Across New South Wales, there are a variety of regulations and planning instruments that deal with the uses of property. Each local government area (council or municipality) usually has its own instruments and there are some overarching state wide planning instruments that apply to specific kinds of developments.

In this particular matter, the Land and Environment Court was asked to consider whether renting a property for short term holidays to large groups of people for up to a week at a time would be in breach of the relevant environment planning legislation and local planning laws, namely the Gosford Planning Scheme Ordinance.

In this particular case, the decision was based on the interpretation of “residential dwelling” and whether the short term nature of the lease meant that the property was being used as a “residential dwelling”.

The Court accepted that the ordinary meaning of “dwelling house” involved the occupation of the property in the same way that a family group in the ordinary way of life would occupy it. Whilst the Court said that some short term leases may satisfy the definition of a dwelling house, granting a lease to a large group of people for parties for a maximum of one week, was inconsistent with the use of the property as a dwelling and accordingly short term holiday use of the property was prohibited.

Landlords of holiday homes may be susceptible to potential civil or criminal proceedings.  Accordingly, it is more important than ever that as a landlord or potential purchaser you understand the relevant the local environmental planning legislation to ensure that your proposed or actual use of property is allowed.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Related News

Zamagias v Saltalamacchia [2026] NSWCA 48: A Lesson on the Value of Contemporaneous Evidence

In a decision handed down by the New South Wales Court of Appeal on 2 April 2026, Justice Adamson with President Ward and Justice Free

Read More

Winner of the Australasian Lawyer 2026 Top Specialist Firm

We are thrilled to announce that we have been recognised by Australasian Lawyers as one of the Top Specialists Firms 2026 in Australia & NZ

Read More

Ownership vs Bailment vs Equitable Ownership

Someone bringing a claim needs to first show that they are entitled to do so – i.e. “standing”. Proving standing generally means proving that the

Read More

Get in touch

Contact our team today

William Roberts Lawyers

Sydney

Level 22
66 Goulburn Street
SYDNEY NSW 2000

PO Box 20424, World Square NSW 2000

Melbourne

Level 7,

171 La Trobe Street
MELBOURNE VIC 3000

 

PO Box 13171, Law Courts VIC 8010

Brisbane

Level 9
193 North Quay
BRISBANE QLD 4000

 

PO Box 12170, George Street QLD 4003

Singapore

Level 19
Singapore Land Tower
50 Raffles Place
SINGAPORE 048623