NEWS

Crimes Legislation Amendment (Proceeds of Crime and Other Measures) Act 2016

False dealing with accounting documents

In 2012, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development working group on bribery recommended that Australia increase the maximum sanctions against legal persons for false accounting under Commonwealth legislation.

In response, the Commonwealth Criminal Code now codifies conduct as criminal where:

A person:

  1. Makes, alters, destroys or conceals an accounting document;
  2. Fails to make an accounting document that the person is under a duty to make; and
  3. Either intends or is reckless to the fact that this conduct would facilitate, conceal or disguise:

    a) The offender or another person receiving or giving a benefit, or
    b) Another person incurring a loss;

where that benefit or loss is not legitimately due.

Severe penalties have been imposed in respect of this conduct.

An individual is punishable on conviction by imprisonment for not more than 10 years and a fine of not more than 10,000 penalty units when found to have acted with intent, and 5 years imprisonment and a fine of not more than 5,000 penalty units when found to have acted recklessly.

A corporation on conviction may be fined not more than the greatest of:

  1. 100,000 penalty units;
  2. A sum three (3) times the benefit directly or indirectly obtained;
  3. 10% of the annual turnover of the body corporate during the relevant period;

The offences will apply both within Australia and overseas, in prescribed circumstances where constitutional power permits.

These sanctions commenced on 1 March 2016.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Related News

Lessons from Bremner v French (No 6) [2026] NSWSC 826

Please, Your Honour, May I Have Some More (of my fees)? – Lessons from Bremner v French (No 6) [2026] NSWSC 826 Justice Parker’s decision

Read More

Zamagias v Saltalamacchia [2026] NSWCA 48: A Lesson on the Value of Contemporaneous Evidence

In a decision handed down by the New South Wales Court of Appeal on 2 April 2026, Justice Adamson with President Ward and Justice Free

Read More

Ownership vs Bailment vs Equitable Ownership

Someone bringing a claim needs to first show that they are entitled to do so – i.e. “standing”. Proving standing generally means proving that the

Read More

Get in touch

Contact our team today

William Roberts Lawyers

Sydney

Level 22
66 Goulburn Street
SYDNEY NSW 2000

PO Box 20424, World Square NSW 2000

Melbourne

Level 7,

171 La Trobe Street
MELBOURNE VIC 3000

 

PO Box 13171, Law Courts VIC 8010

Brisbane

Level 9
193 North Quay
BRISBANE QLD 4000

 

PO Box 12170, George Street QLD 4003

Singapore

Level 19
Singapore Land Tower
50 Raffles Place
SINGAPORE 048623