NEWS

What happens if an insured refuses consent for legal proceedings?

Did you know: where an insured refuses to (or does not) provide the insurer with consent to commence proceedings in the insured’s name, the insurer may need to actually commence proceedings against its own insured to compel the insured to lend their name to the litigation.

 Although in practice this may rarely happen as insureds will usually co-operate with an insurer, in rare (and difficult) circumstances, it does happen. Depending on limitation periods, you may need to commence proceedings against your insured, and third parties, simultaneously.

 By way of quick recap – subrogation takes place where an insurer, after indemnifying their insured, looks to stand in the shoes of its insured and recover amounts from an at-fault third party. The insurer does not have a claim in their own name – rather, any claim is in the name of the insured against the third party or third parties. Therefore, having the insured on board is important not just when it comes to evidence, but whether a matter can even get off the ground!

 Leaving aside fun considerations of whether subrogation derives from equity, common law or contract, the fact is that an insurer does have a right of subrogation, meaning an insurer can force an insured’s hand if it has to. Before doing so, it is important to explain everything clearly and simply to an insured, act reasonably, do everything you reasonably can to obtain the insured’s assistance without resorting to litigation against them, and send the appropriate letters that you may need to rely upon later. Strategically, an insurer should also consider just how much value an insured is going to be in subrogated recovery proceedings with processes such as discovery, evidence preparation, etc where the insured is not co-operating, and what impact that may have on proceedings even if they do take off.

 On top of that, don’t forget other important considerations such as insured vs uninsured loss and limits to subrogation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Related News

Doyles Guide Leading Class Action Lawyers, Australia 2026

William Roberts are proud to announce that  Bill Petrovski and Ding Pan have been selected as Leading Class Actions Lawyers – Australia, 2026. The 2026

Read More

Lessons from Bremner v French (No 6) [2026] NSWSC 826

Please, Your Honour, May I Have Some More (of my fees)? – Lessons from Bremner v French (No 6) [2026] NSWSC 826 Justice Parker’s decision

Read More

Zamagias v Saltalamacchia [2026] NSWCA 48: A Lesson on the Value of Contemporaneous Evidence

In a decision handed down by the New South Wales Court of Appeal on 2 April 2026, Justice Adamson with President Ward and Justice Free

Read More

Get in touch

Contact our team today

William Roberts Lawyers

Sydney

Level 22
66 Goulburn Street
SYDNEY NSW 2000

PO Box 20424, World Square NSW 2000

Melbourne

Level 7,

171 La Trobe Street
MELBOURNE VIC 3000

 

PO Box 13171, Law Courts VIC 8010

Brisbane

Level 9
193 North Quay
BRISBANE QLD 4000

 

PO Box 12170, George Street QLD 4003

Singapore

Level 19
Singapore Land Tower
50 Raffles Place
SINGAPORE 048623