NEWS

Uninsured v Insured losses

Do you know who gets paid and in what order in circumstances where you have settled a matter and there are insured and uninsured losses?

Section 67 of the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) favours the party that funds a recovery action, whether it be the insured taking the action or the insurer exercising a right of subrogation.

For policies entered after 2013, the following method of distribution will apply at settlement for matters where the insurer has funded the recovery action:

  1. The insurer gets, at first instance, all of their legal and administrative costs paid. This includes expert fees, legal fees, filing fees etc.
  2. From what is left of the settlement, the insurer recovers their insured losses.
  3. Once the insurer has been reimbursed in full, then the insured is entitled to its uninsured losses.
  4. Any surplus is retained by the insurer.

(Note a different method of distribution will apply to policies of insurance that were entered into before 2013 and have not been renewed since).

For example, you have issued subrogated proceedings for $100,000, interest and legal costs, which is broken up as follows:

Insured loss                $75,000

Uninsured loss           $25,000

Subtotal claim          $100,000

Legal costs                   $20,000

Total                             $120,000

During the course of the proceeding, you accept an all-inclusive offer of $80,000.

In accordance with section 67 of the Act, the funds will be distributed as follows:

  • $20,000 legal costs paid to the insurer
  • $60,000 insured losses paid to insurer

Because there were no sums left over after costs and the insured losses were paid, the insured receives no payment.

Section 67 might be impractical in matters where the uninsured losses significantly dwarf the insured losses, and it can be contracted out of by entering into a subrogation agreement. A subrogation agreement is preferred in more complex matters and matters involving substantial uninsured loss.

Remember, insurers still have obligations to act with the utmost good faith, which means you cannot simply ignore the uninsured losses where you may otherwise receive a good settlement.

In our experience, open communication from the beginning with the insured and entering into subrogation agreements early in the piece results in less disputes down the track.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Related News

Doyles Guide Leading Class Action Lawyers, Australia 2026

William Roberts are proud to announce that  Bill Petrovski and Ding Pan have been selected as Leading Class Actions Lawyers – Australia, 2026. The 2026

Read More

Lessons from Bremner v French (No 6) [2026] NSWSC 826

Please, Your Honour, May I Have Some More (of my fees)? – Lessons from Bremner v French (No 6) [2026] NSWSC 826 Justice Parker’s decision

Read More

Zamagias v Saltalamacchia [2026] NSWCA 48: A Lesson on the Value of Contemporaneous Evidence

In a decision handed down by the New South Wales Court of Appeal on 2 April 2026, Justice Adamson with President Ward and Justice Free

Read More

Get in touch

Contact our team today

William Roberts Lawyers

Sydney

Level 22
66 Goulburn Street
SYDNEY NSW 2000

PO Box 20424, World Square NSW 2000

Melbourne

Level 7,

171 La Trobe Street
MELBOURNE VIC 3000

 

PO Box 13171, Law Courts VIC 8010

Brisbane

Level 9
193 North Quay
BRISBANE QLD 4000

 

PO Box 12170, George Street QLD 4003

Singapore

Level 19
Singapore Land Tower
50 Raffles Place
SINGAPORE 048623