Did you know? One of the pivotal moments in tort law history features a decomposed snail found in a bottle, which was the subject of the dispute in Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562.
Mrs Donoghue purchased a bottle of ginger beer from a café in Scotland. After she drank the ginger beer she noticed a decomposed snail floating in the liquid. This resulted in her contracting gastroenteritis. She sued the manufacturer of the ginger beer, Mr Stevenson, for damages. However, having no contractual relationship with the manufacturer, Mrs Donoghue had to rely on an action in negligence. The main issue that had to be determined was whether Mr Stevenson, as the manufacturer, owed a duty of care to Mrs Donoghue. At the time, there was no clear legal precedent on the duty of care owed by manufacturers to consumers.
The House of Lords found in favour of Mrs Donoghue, holding that Mr Stevenson did owe a duty of care to Mrs Donoghue. The Court established the “neighbour principle”, which holds that a person owes a duty of care to those closely and directly affected by their actions. This duty was famously articulated by Lord Atkin when he said:
“You must take reasonable care to avoid acts and omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure […] persons who are so closely and directly affected by [your] act that [you] ought reasonably to have them in contemplation when [you] are directing [your] mind to the acts or omissions which are called in question. This standard of reasonable care creates a positive duty on a manufacturer, retailer, distributor or donor to exercise a standard of reasonable care for any injury which is reasonably foreseeable in respect of those goods.”
The decision in Donoghue v Stevenson established the legal framework for modern negligence law. Also, the YouTube parody video is a must see
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
