NEWS

Recoveries against third party insurers direct

Did you know? When an at-fault third party cannot be found or is dead, or a third party company is deregistered, a cause of action exists against the third party insurer direct!

  • Section 51 of the Insurance Contract Act 1984 (Cth)

Section 51 of the Insurance Contracts Act allows a party that has suffered loss due to the action of a third party to proceed with legal action against the third party’s insurer direct, in circumstances where the third party cannot, after “reasonable inquiry”, be found, or where the third party has died.

The extent of the third party insurer’s liability will be contingent on the third party’s insurance policy that was in place.

The “reasonably inquiry” that has to be undertaken will depend on the circumstances of the matter.  For example, “reasonably inquiries” to locate a third party in a small quantum matter will arguably be less onerous than the inquiries required for a larger quantum claim.

  • Section 601AG of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)

Section 601AG of the Corporations Act entitles a party that has suffered loss to a cause of action against the third party company’s insurer direct when the company has been deregistered (in other words, it no longer exists). It is important, however, to distinguish between a company that is deregistered and a company that is in liquidation. To proceed with a claim against a company in liquidation, an application to the Court is required.

In a nutshell, section 601AG removes the need for a party to reinstate a deregistered company and allows a cause of action against the deregistered company’s insurer direct.

  • Section 4 of Civil Liability (Third Party Claims Against Insurers) Act 2017 (NSW)

Uniquely to New South Wales, section 4 of the Civil Liability (Third Party Claims Against Insurers) Act 2017 (NSW) permits recovery against a third party insurer direct, even if a third party is still alive and can be located. To pursue a third party insurer direct in reliance on this Act, the Court’s leave will be required.  Certain criteria will have to be met to obtain the Court leave, including (i) that there is a policy in place between the third party insurer and third party that responds to the insured’s claim, (ii) that the insured has an arguable case, and (iii) that the third party will likely not be able to satisfy a judgment obtained against it.

So remember, just because a third party cannot be found or is dead, or a third party company is deregistered, does not mean you are not entitled to pursue a claim!  As long as the third party or third party company held a policy of liability insurance, there may be a recovery prospect against the third party insurer direct.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Related News

Zamagias v Saltalamacchia [2026] NSWCA 48: A Lesson on the Value of Contemporaneous Evidence

In a decision handed down by the New South Wales Court of Appeal on 2 April 2026, Justice Adamson with President Ward and Justice Free

Read More

Winner of the Australasian Lawyer 2026 Top Specialist Firm

We are thrilled to announce that we have been recognised by Australasian Lawyers as one of the Top Specialists Firms 2026 in Australia & NZ

Read More

Ownership vs Bailment vs Equitable Ownership

Someone bringing a claim needs to first show that they are entitled to do so – i.e. “standing”. Proving standing generally means proving that the

Read More

Get in touch

Contact our team today

William Roberts Lawyers

Sydney

Level 22
66 Goulburn Street
SYDNEY NSW 2000

PO Box 20424, World Square NSW 2000

Melbourne

Level 7,

171 La Trobe Street
MELBOURNE VIC 3000

 

PO Box 13171, Law Courts VIC 8010

Brisbane

Level 9
193 North Quay
BRISBANE QLD 4000

 

PO Box 12170, George Street QLD 4003

Singapore

Level 19
Singapore Land Tower
50 Raffles Place
SINGAPORE 048623