NEWS

Public Interest Costs Orders In Federal Class Actions: Time For A New Approach

BILL PETROVSK I ,* KATRINA LI ,** VINCE MORABITO † AND MATT NICHOL ‡

Australia’s oldest and most important class action regime, which has been regulated since March 1992 by pt IVA of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), is predominantly based on a regime recommended by the Law Reform Commission (‘LRC’) in 1988.
The LRC was acutely aware of the need to deal with one of the barriers to group litigation: the risk of being required to pay a substantial portion of the costs incurred by defendants in the event of an unfavourable outcome.
To address this problem
, the LRC recommended the creation of a class action fund to provide financial assistance to lead plaintiffs. It was not implemented by the government of the day. More than 30 years later, no measures have been taken by successive Commonwealth governments to address this problem.
In practice, this liability has been removed from lead plaintiffs in pt IVA litigation supported by litigation funders and/or after-the-event insurance. But this solution — and in particular the support of litigation funders — has been largely confined to commercial class actions such as shareholder class actions.
As a result, this barrier has remained with respect to many of the potential class actions likely to be appropriately characterised as public interest litigation, including proceedings brought on behalf of vulnerable or disadvantaged persons.
It is the principal aim of this article to submit that, in the current climate of significant class action reform initiatives and recommendations designed to ensure that class actions do serve the interests of class members and the broader community, it is time to introduce a legislative measure designed to reduce this barrier to class action litigation, thus facilitating the filing of class actions that raise matters of public interest.
In light of the continued bi- partisan political opposition to the creation of a public class action fund, our recommendation is to add to pt IVA a modified version of a provision recommended by the Victorian Law Reform Commission (‘VLRC’) in 2018, in relation to Victoria’s class action regime, which is based on pt IVA.
The provision recommended by the VLRC would have empowered trial judges, when deciding whether to make an adverse costs order against unsuccessful lead plaintiffs, to take into account, among other things, the function of class actions in providing access to justice and whether the class action involved a matter of public interest.

Read the full article Public Interest Costs Orders in Federal Class Actions – [07] Petrovski et al [651]

* Principal, William Roberts Lawyers.
** Senior Associate, William Roberts Lawyers.
† Professor, Department of Business Law and Taxation, Monash Business School, Monash
University.
‡ Lecturer in Business Law, College of Business, Central Queensland University.

Related News

Walton Construction Class Action – Media Release

MEDIA RELEASE 16 May 2024 Subcontractors Alliance confirms that Williams & Kersten Pty Ltd, the Lead Applicant in a Federal Court class action against National

Read More

The duty of utmost good faith

In life, they say that honesty is the best policy. But did you know that it is actually also one of the most important provisions in

Read More

Recoveries against third party insurers direct

Did you know? When an at-fault third party cannot be found or is dead, or a third party company is deregistered, a cause of action

Read More

Get in touch

Contact our team today

Stay informed

Keep up-to-date with our regular news and insights

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
William Roberts Lawyers

Sydney

Level 22
66 Goulburn Street
SYDNEY NSW 2000

Melbourne

Level 21
535 Bourke Street
MELBOURNE VIC 3000

Brisbane

Level 8
300 Ann Street
BRISBANE QLD 4000

Singapore

Level 19
Singapore Land Tower
50 Raffles Place
SINGAPORE 048623